グローバル地域研究機構 グローバル・スタディーズ研究セミナー
UTokyo LAINAC 第35回ブラウンバッグシリーズ

Nazia Hussain ナジア・フサイン(東京大学政策ビジョン研究センター特任助教)
Scarcity and Contention in Cities in the Global South

【日時】
2019年1月28日(月曜日)17時30分〜19時
主催】LAINAC、南アジア研究センター(TINDAS)、持続的開発研究センター
【後援】グローバル地域研究機構
【備考】入場無料・事前予約不要
【言語】英語
 *講演終了後、レセプションを予定しています。

1)オープニング:センターの活動の紹介(17:30-17:45)


和田 毅
(東京大学大学院総合文化研究科 研究科長特任補佐)
『グローバル・スタディーズ・イニシアティヴについて』

西崎文子東京大学グローバル地域研究機構 機構長
『グローバル地域研究機構紹介』

受田宏之(東京大学ラテンアメリカ研究センター 副センター長)
『ラテンアメリカ研究センター(LAINAC)紹介』

田辺明生(東京大学南アジア研究センター センター長)
『南アジア研究センター(TINDAS)紹介』

関谷雄一
(東京大学持続的開発研究センター センター長)
『持続的開発研究センター紹介』

藤原帰一(東京大学政策ビジョン研究センター センター長)
『政策ビジョン研究センターおよびNazia Hussain特任助教紹介』



2)講演(17:45-19:00)
 
Nazia Hussain ナジア・フサイン
(東京大学政策ビジョン研究センター特任助教)
Scarcity and Contention in Cities in the Global South

Cities of the Global South, beset with challenges of formal governance, organized crime, and violence associated with criminal and political players, face emergent crises in the age of urbanization and climate related risks. Concerns especially arise about potential resource scarcity, notably, water. Resulting from increasing populations, changing weather patterns, and inequality in access rooted in local political economies and histories, water crises are not distant scenarios but near-present realities. 

Dominant policy explanations, based on ideal types, warn about dystopian futures for these places, calling them battlegrounds for future warfare. These ideal types, I argue, present a starting point, but are not the final word. At best, they provide a static snapshot in time. Yet, lived realities illustrate dynamic interactions among residents, political and criminal players, government officials as well as those who navigate multiple worlds of formal/(in)formal and licit/illicit with ease. 

My work presents an alternative approach. It draws on scholarship on cases from Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and South Asia, which challenges these macro generalizations and identifies an ‘order’ within seeming ‘disorder’. Where the state is perceived absent, scholars point out relationships among actors, including those operating in the grey zones of legality and illegality and government officials at varying levels. 

My work builds on these explanations. At the same time, I focus on emergent crises, which have predominantly remained outside the purview of these conversations. In some cities, violence levels compare to those in war zones; in others, even if body counts do not reach similar levels of intensity, insecurity has become a part of the urban existence, especially for those at the margins. How might political order shaped by violence, crime and deregulated service provision respond to depleted water resources in these places? 

My approach suggests stepping away from explanations of ‘order’ or ‘disorder’ in favor of a high-resolution understanding developed at micro and meso levels. To that end, mechanisms (shaped by methodological preferences) serve as workhorses of explanation. These mechanisms may be comparable across contexts and offer insights of potential use, not only for academic research, but also for pointed policy interventions. 

Understanding how, if, or to what extent such crises may contribute to contention, an increase in frequency and intensity in criminal and (or) political violence or deeper schisms within society along different fault lines is an anticipatory project. Yet, it is a relevant and timely enterprise. 

Making sense of how access to water is implicated in the dynamics of local politics and governance presents an opportunity to address these concerns. My research focuses on these questions in the cities of Karachi, Pakistan and Manila, Philippines.


3)レセプション(19:00-20:30)

【会費】教員・社会人 1,000円、学生 無料
【備考】事前予約不要